🔗 Share this article

Donald Trump's security policy document offers a misguided assessment of Europe. The document asserts that unrestrained immigration and so-called "woke" agendas pose an grave threat to the continent's identity. However, this perspective rests on a serious misinterpretation of the situation. The true danger confronting Europe is not societal but technological and economic backwardness.

A Glaring Growth Divide Separating the US and Europe

Statistics paint a stark picture. Between 2008 and 2023, US GDP surged by 87%, compared to a paltry 13.5% increase for the European Union. Over this time, EU GDP per capita fell from over three-quarters to just 50% of the US level. Strikingly, even the poorest US state now has a greater average income than several leading European economies like France and Italy.

Currently, about 50% of the global 50 largest tech companies are American, while a mere four are from Europe.

The Technological Shortfall: The Core Question

The growing economic gap stems from stronger productivity growth in the United States, fueled by breakthroughs and better use of resources. The landscape of world technology dominance is overwhelmingly US-centric. Over the past fifty years, 241 US firms have scaled into enterprises valued at over $10bn, versus only fourteen in the European continent.

This gap prompts a pressing issue: In the race for future industries like semiconductors, AI, and fusion energy, what is the EU positioned? Most analysts concede it is essentially a two-horse race involving the US and China, with European nations entering at a significant disadvantage.

Underlying Factors of the Continent's Technological Lag

Several key factors explain this technological divide.

• Venture Capital: The US boasts a much more robust and agile network for funding startups. Europe has yet to establish a genuine unified investment market, which limits the scale of emerging companies.
• Regulatory Fragmentation: Complex and divided rules hamper Europe. A American entrepreneur can launch a service under a single set of laws to access a consumer base of over 330 million. The European Union, despite a larger population, is divided among 27 different national systems, creating huge internal barriers.
• Mindset Differences: Attitudes toward entrepreneurial failure vary greatly. In parts of Europe, business failure was historically viewed with stigma, whereas in the United States, it is often considered a valuable lesson.
• Defense Spending: The United States enjoys a deeply integrated innovation pipeline linking defense and academia. The continent's long-term lack of spending in defense has weakened its ability in breakthrough innovation.

A Path Forward: Reasons for Cautious Optimism

In spite of these hurdles, there are causes for optimism. European leaders are increasingly aware of the severe threat and have started to advance substantial change. Key analyses on EU competitiveness and the internal market highlight the need for major changes.

With the right incentives and regulatory reforms, Europe's strengths might enable far greater levels of commercial innovation.

The continent retains considerable advantages: high-quality workforce, excellent education systems, and premier research institutions. Coupled with a large internal market and substantial household savings, these foundations have the potential to trigger a surge of venture creation.

Crucially, even if the EU does not become the leader in developing cutting-edge technologies, it can still dramatically increase productivity by implementing and tailoring innovations from other regions.

An Inflection Point

Europe now stands at a critical crossroads. To paraphrase a famous line, decline often happens "slowly, then all at once". So far, the continent's slide in innovation has been steady. However, without decisive action to address its deep-seated problems, today's slow erosion could turn into a sudden and irreversible loss of global economic relevance.