Advocacy Collective Claims to Have Scraped Millions of Music Tracks from the Streaming Giant
A digital rights organization has claimed to have harvested millions of tracks from the popular streaming service and is getting ready to publish them publicly.
Possible Boost for Artificial Intelligence Development
Industry experts said the seeming data breach could boost AI companies looking for material to train their technology.
An entity known as Annaâs Archive reported it had obtained 86 million music files from Spotify and 256 million rows of metadata such as artist and album names. Spotify, which carries more than 100 million songs, stated that the leak did not constitute its full catalog.
âWe have identified and deactivated the nefarious user accounts that engaged in illegal scraping,â said a company representative.
The Swedish service, which has more than 700 million users worldwide, added that an inquiry into unauthorised access identified a third party collected public metadata and employed questionable tactics to circumvent DRM [digital rights management].
Group's Stated Mission and Concerns
Spotify does not believe the audio acquired by Annaâs Archive has been released yet. Annaâs Archive, which is recognized for offering links to pirated books, said in a blog it wanted to create a âhistorical repositoryâ for music.
They asserted the music files accounted for 99.6% of all music listened to by its listeners and would be distributed via âpeer-to-peer networksâ, a means of exchanging large digital files online.
âNaturally the service doesnât have all the music in the world, but itâs a fantastic beginning,â commented Annaâs Archive, which describes its mission as âsafeguarding humanityâs knowledge and cultureâ.
Model Development and Intellectual Property Debate
Ed Newton-Rex for protecting artistsâ rights, said the leaked music would probably be used for training artificial intelligence systems.
âEducating models on illegally sourced data is unfortunately common in the tech sector, so this stolen music is almost certain to be used instructing AI models,â he said.
The group's website makes references to a large online archive, a huge online archive of pirated books that has allegedly been leveraged by the parent company of Facebook to develop its systems.
A founder of an artificial intelligence company posted on the professional network that members of the public could in principle âcreate their own personal free version of Spotifyâ. He added it could also enable tech companies to âeducate models on modern music at scaleâ.
Copyright has become a battleground between creatives, authors and creatives on one side and AI companies on the other.
Government Considerations and Responses
Across Britain, artists and writers have raised concerns against a ministerial proposal to let AI companies use copyright-protected work without permission unless the rights holder signals. Almost every participant to a government consultation on the idea has supported artistsâ apprehensions.
The secretary of state for science, innovation and technology informed parliament this month there was âno clear consensusâ on the issue, noting that ministers would âuse the time to get this correctâ. The administration has pledged to make regulatory plans on AI and copyright by next year.